News
Turning Crisis into Strategy: Contracts, projects and disputes at a global chokepoint
Spotlight – Adoption of a new multi-year energy program ; Establishment of Confidentiality for In-House Counsel Consultations : Highlights from Our Teams “Commercial” and “Litigation”
Explore all our news by topic : Audio-visual ; Commercial ; Insurance ; Intellectual Property ; Life sciences ; Litigation ; Public Law ; Real estate
On 4 February 2026, Decree No. 2026-60 of 4 February 2026 on the experimentation of games involving monetisable digital objects (JONUM) was adopted pursuant to Law No. 2024-449 of 21 May 2024 aimed at securing and regulating the digital space. The decree establishes a three-year experimental regulatory framework for certain online games allowing players to obtain digital objects that may be transferred or monetised. The decree specifies the prior declaration procedure before the National Gaming Authority (Autorité nationale des jeux, ANJ) for operators wishing to offer such games. It also defines the information that must be submitted to the ANJ and the monitoring powers exercised by the authority within the framework of the experimentation. The text further provides measures aimed at preventing risks associated with these games, particularly regarding user information. The experimental regime is intended to assess the appropriateness of a specific legal framework governing JONUM.
Décr. n° 2026-60, 4 févr. 2026 relatif à l’expérimentation des JONUM, JO 6 févr.
On 6 February 2026, the European Commission issued guidelines on the application of Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1083 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024, establishing a common framework for media services in the internal market (European Media Freedom Act, EMFA).These guidelines clarify the obligations applicable to very large online platforms, as defined in Article 33 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services (Digital Services Act, DSA).In particular, they specify the self-declaration mechanism allowing media service providers to notify platforms of their status, as well as the procedures to be followed where platforms intend to restrict, suspend, or remove content originating from such media providers. These guidelines are intended to facilitate the implementation of the mechanism for the protection of media content provided for in Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1083.
Authored by Iris Accary and Juliette Commeau.
Law No. 2026-122 of 23 February 2026 on confidentiality of in-house counsel consultations (hereinafter referred to as “Terlier Law”) introduces a new Article 58-1 intoLaw No. 77-1130 of 31 December 1971 on the reform of certain judicial and legal professions.
Terlier Law establishes the confidentiality of legal consultations drafted by in-house counsels, or at their request and under their supervision by a member of their team. To this end, five conditions must be met:
Legal consultations and their successive versions, which are covered by confidentiality may not be seized or handed over to a third party, including a French or foreign authority, in the context of civil, commercial or administrative proceedings or litigation. However, such confidentiality may not be invoked in criminal or tax proceedings.
The Terlier Law has not yet entered into force: its application is subject to the issuance of a decree of the French Council of State, expected within twelve months of the law’s promulgation and therefore no later than February 2027.
On 19 February 2026, the French Senate adopted, at first reading and following the initiation of the accelerated procedure, bill aimed at reducing late payments to prevent business failures, which was proposed by Senator Olivier Rietmann on 28 October 2025 (the “Bill”). The text has been transmitted to the French National Assembly for further parliamentary consideration.
The Bill provides for an amendment to Article L.441-16 of the French Commercial Code, relating to the administrative fine incurred in the event of non-compliance with the payment terms set out in Article L.441-10 (I), Article L.441-11 (II), and Articles L.441-12 and L.441-13 of the same code.
It provides that the maximum administrative fine applicable to legal entities will be the higher of the following two amounts: two million euros, or 1% of the worldwide turnover (excluding taxes) achieved during the previous closed financial year. Under the same penalties, clauses or practices that abusively delay the start of payment periods are also prohibited.
Furthermore, the provisions relating to repeated infringements have been amended, providing that the fine is doubled if the breach is repeated within three years (previously two) from the date on which the first sanction decision became final.
The Bill provides that the amendment to Article L.441-16 of the French Commercial Code shall come into force on the day following its publication. This applies to contracts in force on that date, as well as to cases where a repeated breach was sanctioned prior to the law’s entry into force.
Additionally, the Bill amends Articles L.441-10 and L.441-11 of the French Commercial Code, setting the start of the payment period at the date of receipt of the invoice rather than the invoice issue date. However, this provision will only come into force on 1 January 2030.
Finally, Article L.441-10 of the French Commercial Code is amended by the insertion of a new section (II bis), which specifies that any waiver to late-payment penalties is deemed null and void.
Authored by Charlotte Haddad and Lise Guillard.
The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Régulation (“ACPR”) updated, on 10 and 12 February 2026, the pages relating to submission procedures and the information to be provided to the ACPR under Regulation 2022/2554 on digital operational resilience in the financial sector (“DORA Regulation”).
The following changes were made:
Source: Update of information on DORA submissions
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”) published, on 3 February 2026, a public consultation on the supervisory statement concerning the authorisation and supervision of (re)insurance undertakings owned by private equity firms.
EIOPA identified several risks associated with the ownership of (re)insurance undertakings by private equity firms, including (i) short or misaligned investment horizons, which may conflict with long-term commitments towards policyholders, (ii) significant changes in business models, (iii) increased reliance on reinsurance, in particular with reinsurers located in third countries, and (iv) complex ownership structures.
This consultation therefore sets out, for national supervisory authorities, expectations relating to acquisitions of qualifying holdings, portfolio transfers, merger transactions, as well as ongoing supervision.
Stakeholders may submit their comments on the consultation paper until 30 April 2026.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”) published, on 4 February 2026, a public consultation on the prudential treatment of adaptation measures aimed at assessing the interaction between risk mitigation and capital requirements for natural catastrophe insurance in the context of the adoption of Directive 2025/2 of 27 November 2024, amending Directive 2009/138 of 25 November 2009 (“Revised Solvency II”).
The purpose of this consultation is to assess whether the introduction of a specific treatment under Revised Solvency II would be appropriate in order to better reflect the adaptation measures implemented by policyholders (such as reinforced walls to mitigate flood risks) in the calculation of capital requirements for the natural catastrophe module under the standard formula.
Stakeholders may submit their comments on the consultation paper until 17 April 2026.
The European Anti-Money Laundering Authority (“AMLA”) published, on 9 February 2026, a series of consultations relating to three draft regulatory technical standards relating to anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing:
Source: AMLA publishes a series of consultations on the implementation of regulatory technical standards
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”) published, on 13 February 2026, two revised sets of guidelines together with their corresponding final reports concerning (i) the supervisory review process and (ii) the treatment of market risk and counterparty risk exposures in the standard formula, following the adoption of Directive 2025/2 of 27 November 2024 amending Directive 2009/138 of 25 November 2009 (“Revised Solvency II”).
The revised guidelines on the supervisory review process (EIOPA-BoS-25/660) drafted pursuant to Article 36 of Solvency II, have been revised in order to ensure their alignment with recent developments and supervisory best practices, and to take into account the emergence of new topics and trends. They include, in particular, new sections in areas such as business model analysis, joint on-site inspections, early intervention measures, pre-emptive recovery planning, and conduct supervision. They also introduce new guidance on emerging risks, the supervision of ICT risks, technology supervision and sustainability-related risks. These guidelines will apply from 30 January 2027 and repeal and replace the Guidelines on the supervisory review process (EIOPA-BoS-14-178).
The revised guidelines on the treatment of market risk and counterparty risk exposures in the standard formula (EIOPA-BoS-25/664) drafted pursuant to Articles 104 and 105 of Solvency IIand Articles 164 to 202 of Delegated Regulation 2015/35 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of 10 October 2014 were revised in order to update the legal references and to clarify and simplify the text. In particular, three guidelines were deleted, as their content was already sufficiently clear from the provisions of Solvency II. Another guideline was removed in order to ensure alignment with the existing regulatory framework, and a new guideline was introduced to clarify the treatment of leveraged funds. A consolidated version of these guidelines will be published on EIOPA’s website and will become applicable two months after their translation into the official languages of the European Union.
Following the public consultation launched on 29 April 2025, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (“EIOPA”) published, on 16 February 2026, the final reports relating to several guidelines and draft regulatory technical standards in connection with Directive 2025/1 of 27 November 2024 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of insurance and reinsurance undertakings (“IRRD”):
Source: Publication of several guidelines and draft regulatory technical standards under the IRRD
Authored by Ghina Farah and Maxime Kaya.
On 25 February 2026, the Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) of the European Parliament published a report entitled “Copyright and Generative Artificial Intelligence, Opportunities and Challenges”, within the framework of the own-initiative procedure 2025/2058(INI) (report A10-0019/2026). The report examines the legal issues arising from the development of generative artificial intelligence in relation to copyright within the European Union. It recalls the importance of the protection of intellectual property enshrined in Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as the need to ensure effective protection for right holders in the digital environment. In particular, the document analyses the use of protected works in the training processes of generative artificial intelligence systems and the implications of such practices for right holders. This own-initiative report is intended to inform the European institutions on the legal challenges raised by generative AI in the field of copyright and to guide future legislative work of the European Union in this area.
Authored by Iris Accary and Juliette Commeau.
The Order of February 4, 2026, published in the Official Journal on February 7, 2026, amends the Order of August 13, 2014, in order to broaden and specify the conditions under which the analytical phase of medical biology examinations may be performed outside a laboratory, for reasons related to the patient's state of health. Issued on the basis of Articles L. 6211-8-1, L. 6211-13, L. 6211-14, and L. 6211-18 of the Public Health Code, and following the opinion of the High Authority for Health of December 18, 2025, the text establishes the list of eligible locations: medical practices, multi-professional healthcare homes, health centers, Maternal and Child Protection services, residential care facilities for dependent elderly persons (EHPAD), Free Information, Screening and Diagnostic Centers (CeGIDD), sexual health centers, and sanitary vehicles during medicalized transport. The performance of the analytical phase in these structures, with the exception of sanitary vehicles, is subject to an authorization issued by the Director General of the Regional Health Agency (ARS), requested jointly by the structure and the partner laboratory, based on criteria relating to the local supply of medical biology services, the needs of the population, the turnaround times for obtaining results, and the geographical specificities of the territory. It furthermore entails the conclusion of an agreement between the laboratory and the structure, as well as the concomitant submission of an accreditation application to the French Accreditation Committee, although examinations may begin upon receipt of the filing acknowledgment. The order sets out in its annex the lists of authorized examinations, differentiated according to the categories of locations, including in particular biochemical panels and cardiac markers, respiratory virological tests, and screening examinations for sexually transmitted infections for dedicated structures such as CeGIDDs and sexual health centers.
Two orders from February 2026 complete the implementation of the regulatory framework for the restoration to good working order (RBUE) of individual-use medical devices, established by Decree No. 2025-247 of March 17, 2025, issued pursuant to Article L. 5212-1-1 of the Public Health Code. This decree laid the foundations of this unprecedented regime in French law: defining RBUE as the set of upkeep and maintenance operations carried out on a device already put into service with a view to allowing its redistribution to other patients, mandatory certification of operators, and the implementation of a traceability system. The two orders complement this framework by specifying its practical contours. The first, dated February 24, 2026, establishes the list of devices eligible for this activity: fourteen categories, all registered on the list of reimbursable products and services (Art. L. 165-1 CSS), which include medical beds, the main mobility aids (canes, crutches, walkers, standing and lifting devices, vehicles for disabled persons), certain off-the-shelf orthoses (lumbar belts, cervical collars, orthopaedic correction devices, excluding thermoformable devices), as well as sensory aids (frames, visual aids for amblyopes, hearing aids). The second order, dated February 26, 2026, makes the French standard NF S97-414:2026, relating to the general and safety requirements applicable to the RBUE activity, binding upon certified operators, thus guaranteeing a harmonized level of quality and safety of use for reconditioned devices; any equivalent standard legally recognized in another Member State of the European Union, the EEA, or Turkey may be substituted for it.
Authored by Joséphine Pour & Gauthier Zimmer.
Law No. 2026-122 of February 23, 2026, which was published in the OJ of February 25, 2026, following the decision of the Conseil constitutionnel of February 18, 2026, establishes a protection regime for legal advice drafted by in-house counsel. This new framework, integrated into the Law of December 31, 1971, provides that legal opinions are covered by confidentiality provided that the counsel holds a Master's degree in law (or equivalent), has completed specific ethical training, and the document bears the mandatory seal "Confidential - Legal Consultation - In-house Counsel".
Such consultations are now protected against any seizure or disclosure to third parties in the context of civil, commercial, or administrative proceedings. However, the text specifies that this confidentiality cannot be invoked in criminal or tax proceedings, nor against the oversight powers of the European Commission or other EU authorities. In the event of a dispute regarding the nature of a document during a seizure, the law provides for the intervention of a court enforcement officer to place the items under seal pending arbitration by a judge.
Source: Law No. 2026-122 of February 23, 2026
Authored by Nicolas Rohfritsch and Guillaume Vermersch.
Decree no. 2026‑117 on measures to simplify local public action and the regulations applicable to local authorities and their groupings, published in the official journal of the French Republic (OJFR) on 21st February 2026 and adopted as part of the “France simplification” and “Roquelaure simplification” initiatives, amends several codes, including the public procurement code and the energy code.
In section 2 concerning article R.2172‑2 of the public procurement code, the decree exempts local authorities, local public institutions, and groupings of local authorities from the obligation to organise a design competition for awarding a project management contract when the estimated value of the needs is below €300,000 excluding VAT. This threshold may be adjusted by decree.
Concerning the energy code, section 8 of the decree simplifies several rules governing hydraulic installations. Notably, it streamlines the processing of applications for works shared between concession and non‑concession areas, amends article R.521‑52 of the energy code to require concessionaires to submit to the granting authority an overview of works identified as necessary for the preparation and development of future operations, and amends article R.521‑55 of the same code to allow concessionaires to propose and carry out preliminary works, which may subsequently be reimbursed through the dedicated account.
Decree no. 2026‑76 of 12 February 2026 on the multi‑year energy program (“PPE”), published in the official journal of the French Republic (OJFR) on 13 February 2026, sets out new priority actions for public authorities in managing energy sources across continental metropolitan France for the 2026–2035 period.
The new PPE, annexed to the decree, is structured around three main pillars (energy supply security, energy price control, and the fight against climate change). Each pillar is detailed and accompanied by objectives as well as prescriptive or incentive‑based tools to support their implementation.
In addition to adopting the PPE, the decree introduces a ban, until 31st December 2028, on accelerating the pace of public support awards for onshore wind and photovoltaic projects and, from that date onwards, it allows for the adjustment of the capacity to be awarded or contracted for renewable electricity generation facilities. With respect to onshore wind specifically, priority should be given to repowering existing wind farms. Finally, by the end of 2026, the Government will publish a report on developments in electricity consumption, the deployment of decarbonised electricity generation capacity, and the expansion of decarbonised flexibility resources.
Decree no. 2026‑98 establishing the regime governing fees owed for the occupation of the State’s public domain and that of its public institutions by electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure, published in the official journal of the French Republic (OJFR) on 18 February 2026, introduces new provisions into the energy code concerning domain occupancy fees applicable to electricity transmission and distribution. It also repeals decree no. 56‑151 of 27 January 1956 governing the previous fee regime.
The decree sets out, in particular, the fees applicable to operators of public electricity networks for occupying the State’s or its public institutions’ public domain with transmission or distribution infrastructure, depending on the type of occupation. Each year on 1st January, the fees amounts are adjusted in line with the engineering index. In addition to paying these fees, transmission and distribution network operators must cover any new costs their network infrastructure imposes on public‑domain managers.
Furthermore, the decree exempts from any prior competitive bidding procedure or publicity procedure the issuance of an occupancy deed to the benefit of public electricity network operators.
Finally, the decree postpones to 1st January 2027 its application to existing public‑domain occupancy authorisations or agreements in force on the date it enters into effect.
Authored by Bruno Cantier, Astrid Layrisse and John Eric Dicka.
In a ministerial response dated 27 January 2026, the Government reiterated that coliving is already governed by the existing legal framework, in particular the Act of 6 July 1989 aimed at improving landlord–tenant relations and amending Act No. 86‑1290 of 23 December 1986, provided that the dwelling constitutes the tenant’s principal residence occupied for more than eight months per year. As this legal regime is mandatory, the parties may not derogate from it.
As a reminder, coliving is a housing model combining a private space for each resident (typically a furnished bedroom or studio) with shared common areas and, in some cases, shared services. Designed to promote social interaction, flexibility and administrative simplicity, coliving mainly attracts young professionals, students and individuals in professional mobility who seek both autonomy and community living in a modern, well‑equipped environment. More recently, the model has also begun to develop for senior residents.
The Government emphasises that serviced residences, where coliving arrangements are most frequently implemented, are subject to a strict regulatory framework limiting non‑individualised services so as to avoid excessive charges.
The Government therefore concludes that it is unnecessary to create a new legal status, particularly in a context where the administration is seeking to streamline and simplify existing mechanisms.
Decree No. 2026‑121 of 20 February 2026 introduces targeted amendments to the regulatory section of the Tourism Code relating to commercial tourist accommodations. The purpose of the text is to ensure consistency and legal certainty within the existing framework, without overhauling the applicable regime.
With respect to commercial tourist accommodations (hotels, tourist residences, campsites, holiday villages, residential leisure parks, and furnished tourist rentals), the decree primarily makes drafting corrections and updates internal cross‑references within the Tourism Code.
The decree also clarifies the classification procedure: classification is voluntary, granted for a five‑year period, and based on a complete application reviewed by an accredited body (Atout France). The competent authority examines the application within defined timelines, and an establishment that no longer meets the applicable classification criteria may be removed from the official list. The decree therefore strengthens the administrative process, harmonises legal references, and provides clearer obligations for operators, while maintaining the existing framework and without substantially modifying their responsibilities.
As a reminder, each category of establishment is subject to a dedicated scoring grid based on a points system covering facilities and amenities (room or unit size and comfort, common areas), customer services (reception, front‑desk operations, catering, linen services, entertainment), and accessibility and sustainability (facilities for people with reduced mobility, eco‑responsible initiatives). Each criterion carries a number of mandatory or optional points, and the total score determines the final classification of the establishment, from 1 to 5 stars. These grids are set by ministerial order and aim to harmonise practices by ensuring that the classification reliably reflects the quality and level of services offered to guests.
Authored by Margot Derumaux, Cécile Pampagnin and Thomas Demard.